Slap shot silence

You may remember that in October the Kountze School District had been slapped with a temporary injunction (an order which restrains a person from effecting a legal action or orders redress to an injured party) to prevent the display of banners with a Christian message. Public school high school cheerleaders had used their own money, made the banners off-campus, and unfurled the banners at football games.  The school district, concerned that the student-led Christian display was an Establishment Clause violation, had banned the cheerleaders from displaying the messages. The First Amendment prohibits the government from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion” and forbids the government from establishing an official religion and prohibits government favoring one religion over another.

Wednesday, a state district judge disagreed with the school district and held that the school could not prohibit such displays.  The school district will now have to appeal.

One legislator displayed his unhappiness with the Travis County District Attorney by criticizing one of its lead attorneys Rosemary Lehmberg who pled guilty to drunken driving in April and who is due for early release (serving less than your full sentence because of good behavior while incarcerated).   Rep. Phil King (R-Weatherford) called for District Attorney Lehmberg’s resignation and proposed HB 3153 to transfer the state’s public integrity unit (currently housed in the Travis County District Attorney’s office) to the Texas Attorney General’s office when the local District Attorney (like Lehmberg) is convicted of a crime.  King called it a “shot across the bow” to force Lehmberg to resign.

And speaking of cheap shots, the budget battle turned into a war of words when Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-Houston) went after Rep. Harvey Hilderbran (R-Kerrville) who authored HB 500—a bill giving $661 million in tax cuts to businesses including specific industries (e.g. insurance, hospitals, and oil and gas).

The two sparred over whether the tax cuts were at the expense of public education. Hildebran argued that strong business growth through tax incentives (reductions in taxes that businesses would have to otherwise pay) would fuel more taxes long-term into education. Turner challenged cutting the franchise tax because he favors restoring funding for over $5.4 billion in education cuts made last biennial session (two year legislative cycle).

At one point Turner accused Hildebran of not being truthful and questioned his competency by making a veiled reference to Hildebran’s public  statement that he is considering running for Comptroller of the Public Accounts (the chief of the state’s finances,  tax collections,  accounts, revenue estimations, and treasurer).

The quip caused the legislature to go to go unusually silent. Turner later apologized.

Governor Rick Perry is not apologizing for pushing hard to get HB 500 passed because it is a cornerstone of his legislative agenda this term.  He has threatened to call a special session (a short 30 day term called by the Governor to address specific issues) if legislators fail to pass “significant tax relief” this year.

Take that!

Shutting the door

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals slammed Planned Parenthood of Texas this week when it denied an appeal by the nation’s largest abortion provider.  In 2011, the Texas legislature prohibited organizations which provide abortion access from being funded by the state, and the Governor enforced that law by mandating that the Women’s Health Program (Texas’ largest public health program) reject funding for Planned Parenthood because it gives women abortion information.  A federal district court had given an injunction (a cease-and-desist order granted by courts which prevents a party from doing something) to Planned Parenthood to prevent Texas from pulling the money. A Fifth Circuit three-judge panel lifted the injunction in August, but the latest appeal was for an en banc rehearing (an appeal to have the full panel re-hear the case because one party argues that the three-judge panel made “exceptional mistakes”).  The denial of a rehearing means that the case is final pending a U.S. Supreme Court appeal.

The states administer Medicaid (the federal health care insurance program for low-income persons), and Texas is one of several conservative states pushing to end taxpayer support for Planned Parenthood. While federal dollars can’t cover abortions, pro-life supporters argue that if Planned Parenthood isn’t given federal monies for cancer screenings and birth control, then that frees up Planned Parenthood’s funds to provide abortion counseling.   Planned Parenthood has 77 independent local affiliates operating about 800 health centers in the U.S., and in Texas, Planned Parenthood is the Women’s Health Program’s largest provider—servicing 40%-50% of patients annually.  About 3% of all its health services are abortion-related. In Texas, neither the agency nor its affiliates perform the procedure.  What conservative groups are hoping is that cutting off funds will stop abortion counseling.

The state’s decision to close the door on federal funding will cost Texas $36.3 million in the first year and $45.2 million in the second.  Prior to this, the state of Texas paid about $5 million per year into the program.   As of November 1, the Women’s Health Program opens its doors. Under the new rules, doctors may give women information about family planning, but must give information in a non-directive way.  What does that mean?  Doctors may offer women with information about who provides abortions, but the physician cannot make a formal referral.

Guess we’ll have to wait and see what happens when women walk out the door.

And speaking of closed doors, Attorney General Greg Abbott told Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE) could not be observers in the November elections here in Texas.  The organization, along with Project Vote—a watchdog group which monitors activities of government—had asked to be election monitors because of the state’s voter ID measure (which is not yet in effect because it is being appealed). Such election monitors (persons who come and observe voting activities to make sure the laws are being followed) are thought to be important, especially in states like Texas, which have a long history of voting rights violations.  Abbott argued, however, that the requests were at odds with the Texas’ Election Code because of concerns that the groups would not be “restrained in their activities.” Out of that concern, Abbott indicated that he will have officials block such groups if they come within 100 feet of a polling place.  Doesn’t sound like they are getting in that door even if they have been since 2002 when President George W. Bush invited the OSCE to watch elections in the U.S.